My friends Jim and Sue Chilton own a cattle ranch just south of the small town of Arivaca, Arizona. Their ranch borders on the U.S.-Mexican border. Border protection consists of a four-strand barbed wire fence which smugglers and illegal immigrants can cross with ease.
The following is a letter written by Jim Chilton:
We are outraged that over 2,500 border crossers have been filmed tromping through our ranch since February of this year. To our consternation, during the last two years we document approximately a ten-fold increase in the number of international border crossers on our ranch, compared to prior years. On our ranch south of Arivaca, Arizona evidence of the 2,500 international border crossers is established in the following youtube film:
Notice, these illegal border crossers are wearing camouflaged clothes, backpacks and carpet shoes in stark contrast to Texas immigrants who wear casual street clothes. Only 84 of the individuals filmed appear to be women, and not one young child has been filmed with these groups in any of our years of placing these cameras.
The five ranch trails with motion-activated cameras are a very small sample of the approximately 100 trails crossing our ranch. All of these trails lead north from our ranch southern boundary at the international border to major US highway connectors where drugs and people can be transported to all parts of this Nation. Given our small percent of trail-monitoring cameras, we are left to wonder how many thousand ranch intruders entered on the far larger number of trails with no cameras.
One border patrol intelligence officer estimated 20% of the crossers on our ranch are drug packers (or approximately 500). Reportedly, 108,000 Americans are dead from overdoses in our Nation in the last twelve months. Drugs coming across our ranch, many fabricated in Mexican labs using precursor ingredients from China, almost certainly account for some of those deaths.
The following is a copy of Jim’s Declaration to the U. S. District Court of ranch facts:
1. The border wall was constructed along the international border across my neighbors’ land to our west and began continuing east across a portion of my ranch, but the federal government’s progress on it ceased on or about January 20, 2021, leaving roughly half a mile of the southeasternmost boundary of my U.S. Forest Service Grazing Allotment land along the U.S.-Mexico border unprotected but for a four-strand barbed wire fence designed to discourage cattle from crossing.
2. Portions of the border wall where a physical barrier is present on my land are still unfinished as they do not contain operating lights, electronic sensors, or other technology that may aid enforcement at the border.
3. I maintain motion-activated cameras on my grazing land, and many of these are in areas through which individuals crossing the border frequently pass.
4. These cameras show there has been a dramatic increase in the volume of individuals coming across the border and through my ranch since construction on the border wall ceased.
5. It appears that the presence of the wall to the west has redirected human traffic around its end, focusing it onto my ranch, leading to an increased severity in the human impact through the additional volume of traffic.
6. Individuals crossing the border and traversing my ranch affect the local environmental conditions in many ways:
a. They leave trash and other waste and debris behind them.
b. They cut unauthorized trails and otherwise trample or damage plants and habitats through wilderness areas that contain Endangered Species Act protected species, including one trail through a part of California Gulch which federal authorities have expressly excluded from my cattle grazing use in order to protect its ecosystem.
c. They cut fences and other barriers intended to prevent animal traffic, including those intended to keep cattle from entering unauthorized grazing areas.
d. They participate in violent acts including shooting firearms, leaving spent casings and making the area dangerous for citizens.
7. On September 24, 2021, three men with long guns fired at Border Patrol personnel on part of my ranch’s grazing land in Holden Canyon.
8. The danger of physical violence from individuals crossing the border has led my employees to refuse to gather cattle in our southernmost grazing lands or pastures because they are close to the international border.
9. Our federal grazing permits from the U.S. Forest Service require that the cattle be moved seasonally to other pastures in order to responsibly manage the environmental impact of grazing on those lands, but the risk to human life caused by the passage of illegal individuals around and past the end of the unfinished border wall is currently seriously impacting our ability to round up our cattle to move the cattle to winter pastures.
10. U.S. Forest Service personnel have informed me that they have been ordered by their superiors not to go to my border pastures where they would typically monitor environmental and ecological conditions.
11. The U.S. Forest Service’s monitoring of grass conditions on grazing lands is used by us and by the Forest Service in the management of the ecology of those lands to maintain the science-based appropriate balance of grazing use to promote a healthy environment. We have received environmental awards for our range management and have cooperated for decades to reduce illegal impacts which are now rampant and uncontrolled.
12. This monitoring also impacts the capacity limits on my ranch’s grazing permits as part of the U.S. Forest Service’s management programs.
13. I have attempted to make appointments for the U.S. Forest Service to send personnel out to conduct such monitoring, but these appointments have been canceled due to their reaction to the violent danger near the border where the wall is not complete.
14. The abandoned border wall construction project left gulches and other waterways that traverse the international border with floodgates unfinished or uninstalled.
15. The absence of floodgates at the border wall creates gaps in the physical barrier that allow human traffic through these ephemeral waterways, which are seasonally used by protected species such as the Sonoran Chub.
16. The people who cross the border through these waterways where floodgates are not installed leave trash and other waste and potential contaminants behind.
17. Gulches can experience significant flooding during rains, as California Gulch did during the summer of 2021, for instance.
18. The state in which the wall construction site has been left after construction ceased, including the lack of floodgates, contributes to the environmental impact of such flooding.
For the reasons above, the cessation of work on the border wall has led to serious, negative environmental impact on my ranch lands and has severely impacted my ability to use the resource for which I am paying and which I have worked diligently to conserve. Large gaps in the wall–left open when President Biden abruptly ordered the stoppage of construction the day he was inaugurated– put in danger: my family, the U.S. Forest Service range management and fire-fighting personnel, and recreationists using the Forest for legal purposes.
When Mr. Foxx was president of Mexico, he wanted to put up a 100 meter wide fence all along the border. The fence would have been mesquite and other thorn brush, cacti, and so on. It would have been listed as ‘wildlife habitat’. Thorns and predators deter mojados. Add manzanita and you’ll raise something that resists tanks. But, it burns easily. But, it regenerate fast and is favored by goats and deer as feed. Wild olives are usually covered in thorns and goats will browse it. Even the nuttiest liberal cannot whine about a hedge that’s a good wildlife habitat.
Comments are closed.