Last Sunday, Tony Davis had a story in the Arizona Daily Star with an apocalyptic headline: “Destructive Southwest wildfires bear ‘really clear’ sign of warming,” complete with a hockey stick-like graph of wildfires in the print edition. The story itself is actually more balanced than the headline would suggest. Maybe the headline was an editor’s idea. Throughout the story, however, Tony mentions “human-induced warming” without citing any supporting evidence that warming is human-induced. The picture is not quite so “really clear” because the picture is complicated by many factors.
Two graphs below, which I constructed from data from the National Interagency Fire Center, would initially seem to support Tony’s contention, but as we will see, the data reflect just a regional effect during a short time interval that does not give a true picture.
We see from these graphs, that
in the early 1980s, the frequency of fires in the U.S. dropped dramatically and remained low ever since. At the same time, the number of acres burned has increased dramatically, thereby giving a “hockey stick” appearance. The drop in fires around 1981 may be due to a great increase in both winter and summer precipitation (See figure 1 here). Precipitation is greatly influenced by the ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation) cycle. The short-term effect would be to suppress fires, but the longer-term effect would be to increase biomass fuel available for burning when things got drier. A change in forest management under the Endangered Species Act, i.e, lack of forest thinning may be contributory.
As we will see below, in some parts of the world, warming decreases fire frequency and intensity.
The graphs above, show a relatively short time interval. The graph below, based on presence of charcoal trapped in sediments, shows a longer, 3,000-year perspective of cyclical wildfire regimes (source: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/9/E535). Short-term variations are intrinsically smoothed in this study. Notice that the trend is slightly downward.
In Canada over the last several thousand years, fire frequency and intensity decreased with a warming climate. “[D]endroecological studies show that both frequency and size of fire decreased during the 20th century in both west and east Canadian coniferous forests possibly due to a drop in drought frequency and an increase in long-term annual precipitation.”
At Lake Tahoe in Nevada, fire frequency increased with warming and decreased with cooling, but “current fire episode frequency on the west shore of Lake Tahoe is at one of its lowest points in at least the last 14,000 years.”
In Colorado, “fires occurred during short-term periods of significant drought and extreme cool (negative) phases of ENSO (El Nino) and [the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO)] and during positive departures from [the mean Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO)] index,” while “at longer time scales, fires exhibited 20-year periods of synchrony with the cool phase of the PDO, and 80-year periods of synchrony with extreme warm (positive) phases of the AMO.” These oscillations are solar-driven and impact both temperature and precipitation.
For southern Arizona grasslands, increases in fire frequency are coincident with the onset of ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillation).
In Finland, fire frequency decreased during warming and “the climatic change that triggered the increase in fire frequency was cooling and a shift to a more continental climate.”
In Siberia, fire frequency has decreased significantly since the 18th Century.
In Turkey, “climatically-induced variation in biomass availability was the main factor controlling the timing of regional fire activity during the Last Glacial-Interglacial climatic transition, and again during Mid-Holocene times, with fire frequency and magnitude increasing during wetter climatic phases.”
In Australia, fire activity diminished with increased warming.
The CO2Science conclusion: “Consequently, considering all of the above findings, although one can readily identify specific parts of the planet that have experienced both significant increases and decreases in land area burned over the last several decades, for the globe as a whole there has been absolutely no relationship between rising temperatures and total area burned over this latter period, when climate alarmists claim the world warmed at a rate and to a degree that were unprecedented over the past several millennia. And as a result, there is little support for the model-based contention that future CO2-induced global warming (if it occurs at all) will have any effect on global fire trends.”
The data above deals mainly with natural, lightning-caused fires. Further complicating the issue are fires caused by humans, either by accident or arson (for arson fires caused as a diversion to illegal entry across the Mexican border, see Our unsecured border – causes and consequences).
Is the sign still so “really clear”?
P.S. From Los Alamos National Laboratory: “Measurement taken during the 2011 Las Conchas fire near Los Alamos National Laboratory show that the actual carbon-containing particles emitted by fires are very different than those used in current computer models, providing the potential for inaccuracy in current climate-modeling results. We’ve found that substances resembling tar balls dominate, and even the soot is coated by organics that focus sunlight,…Both components can potentially increase climate warming by increased light absorption.” Read more
(A version of this article first appeared in the Arizona Daily Independent)